Cases 31 - 40 of 4,677
Taylor et al v. Salt Lake City Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Defendant:
Salt Lake City Corporation, Travis Christensen, Craig Weinheimer and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Taylor and Samuel Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kosher Eats LLC et al v. Welch et al
as 2:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Torben Welch, Charles Cavanagh, Kathleen Carter and others
Plaintiff:
HomePeople Corporation, Emerald Consulting Partners LLC, MSC Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Martinez v. Martinez, et al
as 24-2105
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and RICHARD MARTINEZ
Petitioner:
ARMANDO MARTINEZ
Collins (PS) v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv02091
Defendant:
Richards Geoffry, Dean Williams, Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Dashay Kennyada Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaufarb v. McDonnell et al
as 1:2024cv02034
Defendant:
Stelios Papadopoulos, William B. Jones, Stephen A. Sherwin and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Blaufarb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10 Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Bryant v. Oklahoma City FTC et al
as 5:2024cv00726
Respondent:
Oklahoma City FTC, Bop and Administration and FNU Zook
Petitioner:
Richard Lynn Bryant, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jenkins et al v. Beaver County et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Marki Rowley, Davis County, Kali Gleave and others
Plaintiff:
Marsha Gillespie, Camille Topham, Tanner Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Webb
Defendant:
Lopez, Richard Williams, Sgt. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
