Cases 31 - 40 of 244
King v. Silva-Markham Partners et al
as 1:2021cv01703
Defendant:
Jose Silva, Holly Jackson, Bobby Nathan and others
Plaintiff:
John King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Marquez-Silva v. Fox
as 5:2021cv00321
Petitioner:
Alejandro Daniel Marquez-Silva
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BS Enterprises v. Beckley et al
as 1:2021cv00145
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Robert D Beckley and Cynthia C Beckley
Plaintiff:
BS Enterprises and BS Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
BS Enterprises, LLP
3Rd Party Defendant:
John Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Silva v. United States
as 21-2005
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA SILVA
Silva v. United States, et al
as 21-1008
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BRANDON SHAW
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDERSON COUTINHO SILVA
Watkins v. Los Angeles County California et al
as 0:2020cv00246
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Counsel Cruz, Los Angeles County Counsel Castro-Silva, Los Angeles County Senior Engineer Fire and others
Plaintiff:
Maryann Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TTEC Holdings, Inc. v. Da Silva
as 1:2020cv03645
Plaintiff:
TTEC Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Maurice Da Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marmolejo v. Barr
as 20-9611
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
LUIS MIGUEL SILVA MARMOLEJO
Silva-Negrete v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv03029
Plaintiff:
Ana Silva-Negrete
Defendant:
Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C1.G v. Siegfried, et al
as 20-1320
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYNN THOMAS, Dean at Cherry Creek High School, CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 5, SCOTT SIEGFRIED, Superintendent of Cherry Creek School District and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C1.G, on behalf of his minor son, C.G., the aggrieved party
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
