Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Hudson v. Cahill
as 2:2015cv02319
Plaintiff:
Max Gene Hudson
Defendant:
Matt Cahill, U.S. Marshal Service, Mike Eastwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Villasenor v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03101
Plaintiff:
Domingo Villasenor
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Sanchez and U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garewal v. Sliz, et al
as 14-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON BRADLEY GAREWAL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOROME SLIZ, U.S. Marshal, GILLIAN FLECK, U.S. Marshal, CRUMB, Doctor and others
Veren v. U.S. Dept of Justice, et al
as 14-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WARREN VEREN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, MARY HERNDON, Administrator, U.S. Marshal Service and others
Jimenez v. Frias et al
as 2:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Noe J Jimenez
Defendant:
Manuel Frias, Joshua Savage, John Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villasenor v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03493
Plaintiff:
Domingo Villasenor
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Sanchez and U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garewal v. U.S. Marshall et al
as 1:2012cv02348
Plaintiff:
Milton Bradley Garewal
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall, Crum, (I) Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Still v. Herndon, et al
as 11-1463
Petitioner - Appellant:
MINOR MICHAEL STILL
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY HERNDON, Administrative Service, U.S. Marshall, Colorado, KEN DEAL, Deputy United States Marshal, Colorado and HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Hunter v. Fania, et al
as 11-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARIAN HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN NAMED U. S. MARSHAL 1, UNKNOWN NAMED U.S. MARSHALL 2, FANIA and others
Harris v. Kammerzell
as 11-1206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN L. KAMMERZELL, U.S. Marshal, Against his Individual and Official Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
