Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 157
Phillips 66 Carrier LLC v. 4.2 Acres, Osage County, Oklahoma, more or less et al
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff: Phillips 66 Carrier LLC
Defendant: 4.2 Acres, Osage County, Oklahoma, more or less, United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Roni R Brumley and others
Arcamone-Makinano, et al v. Haaland, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-8006
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMELIA ARCAMONE-MAKINANO, CRAIG C. DOWNER, TOM GAGNON and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBORAH HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of United States Department of Interior and TRACY STONE-MANNING, in her official capacity as Director of United States Bureau of Land Management
Hemry, et al v. Ross, et al
as 22-8002
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRETT HEMRY, Individually, and as Next Friend of F.M.H. and GENALYN HEMRY, individually and as next friend of F.M.H., a minor child
Defendant / Appellant: BRADLEY M. ROSS and MEHRAN AZIZIAN, Agents and Servants of the National Park Service, United States Department of Interior
Defendant: ROBERT R. COOKE, BRETT M. TILLERY, Agents and Servants of the Sheriff of Park County Wyoming and JOHN DOE 10
Cloud Peak Energy Inc et al v. United States Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00120
Respondent: United States Department of Interior Secretary, Office of Natural Resources Revenue Director, United States Department of Interior and others
Petitioner: National Mining Association, Cloud Peak Energy Inc, Wyoming Mining Association and others
Intervenor: State of California and State of New Mexico
Consolidated Petitioner: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association Inc, American Petroleum Institute, Western Fuels-Wyoming Inc and others
Amicus Curiae: Independent Petroleum Association of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Audubon of Kansas v. United States Department of Interior, et al
as 21-3209
Plaintiff / Appellant: AUDUBON OF KANSAS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant: BIG BEND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE/DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
American Petroleum, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8076
Petitioner / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Petitioner: CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, WYOMING MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent / Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Western Watersheds Project v. National Park Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00719
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project
Defendant: National Park Service and United States Department of Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
UTE Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. United States Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00573
Defendant: Deb Haaland, Spencer Cox, United States Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff: Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
API, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al
as 21-8077
Petitioner: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, CLOUD PEAK ENERGY, INC., NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Proctor et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00307
Plaintiff: Jarrod Proctor and Gwendolyn Proctor
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?