Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Ellis v. Crow et al
as 5:2022cv00406
Petitioner:
Antonio Garcia Ellis
Respondent:
William Rankins, Scott Crow and Chris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nobles v. Rankins
as 5:2022cv00376
Petitioner:
Kerry Ryan Nobles
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redfearn v. Rankins
as 22-6061
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE DEAN REDFEARN
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW and CHRIS RANKINS, acting Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
McRoberts (ID 117607) v. Fikes et al
as 5:2021cv03141
Defendant:
Hope Fikes and Jason Rankin
Plaintiff:
Anthony McRoberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Crow, et al
as 21-7006
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTI QUICK, Chief of Security, MARK KNUTSON, Director Designee ODOC, MR. BENEFIELD, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
It Works Marketing et al v. Melaleuca et al
as 2:2021mc00056
Defendant:
Kimberly Bertolucci, Amber Hoerner, Katie Herold and others
Petitioner:
Collette Boden
Consolidated Defendant:
Amanda Gully
Plaintiff:
It Works Marketing
Mullins v. Pinon Real Estate et al
as 1:2020cv02612
Defendant:
Brett Richard Rankin and Pinon Real Estate
Plaintiff:
Joshua Burley Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Sol Vista Mental Health et al
as 1:2020cv02504
Defendant:
Sol Vista Mental Health and Brett Rankin
Plaintiff:
Joshua Burley Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Crow et al
as 6:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Samatha Anderson, Ms. Evan, Tommy Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
