Cases 41 - 50 of 108
Bussey v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
Royce Bussey
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., Howell M. Estes, III, Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01140
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., Jeffrey R. Tarr, Howell M. Estes, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Estes v. Werlich, et al
as 17-1155
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN N. ESTES
Respondent - Appellee:
T. G. WERLICH, M. D. CARVAJAL, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Assad v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
George Assad
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marcus E Lolar
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The and Burl Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Nichole Lynnae Estes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rouse v. Allbaugh et al
as 6:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Troy Russell Rouse
Defendant:
Joe M. Allbaugh , Terry Royal , William Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes v. Poffel, et al
as 16-7086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS W. ESTES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH POFFEL, Muskogee County Police Officer, WESLEY BILES, Muskogee Police Officer, MUSKOGEE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
USA v. $75,740.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2016cv02458
Defendant:
$75,740.00 in United States Currency, $63,920.00 in United States Currency, 2013 Mercedes Benz GL450, VIN: 4JGDF7CE0DA114351 and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
