Cases 41 - 50 of 1,010
In re: Mitchell
as 23-7052
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Respondent:
JASON CHENNAULT, Sheriff, Cherokee County and SARA HILL, Cherokee Nation Attorney General
Mitchell v. Parris, et al
as 23-5081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY BRYANT JONES, Attorney Cherokee Nation, individual capacity, ZACHARY STARKEY, Captain Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity, DETENTION OFFICER MALLOT, Rogers County Sheriff Department, individual capacity and others
Hale-El v. Boulder County Jail, et al
as 23-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOULDER COUNTY JAIL, SEAN METCALF, Badge #1469, BADGE #1418 and others
Saxena v. Allen
as 23-1212
Counter Defendant:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Counter Claimant:
JEFFERY THOMAS ALLEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Mitchell v. Harwell et al
as 5:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Mitchell, III
Defendant:
Capt Scott Harwell, John Doe and Michael Klika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Barteaux
as 4:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Defendant:
T Luke Barteaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ciccolelli v. Nationwide General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Ciccolelli
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company, ADT Security Services and Amanda Mitchell
Interested Party:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griggs v. Stancil
as 1:2023cv01487
Plaintiff:
Arthur Mitchell Griggs
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
