Cases 41 - 50 of 75
United States v. Avila
as 16-2193
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OMAR MOISES AVILA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Avila-Ramos v. Kammerzell
as 1:2016cv01221
Defendant:
Kenneth Deal and John L. Kammerzell
Petitioner:
Mirella Ivonne Avila-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Avila-Hernandez v. Lynch
as 16-9520
Petitioner:
CARLOS AVILA-HERNANDEZ, AKA Juan Barraza-Ortega
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company v. AIFA Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
Defendant:
AIFA Trucking LLC, Silva Trucking, Inc., Luis Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8705
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company v. AIFA Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00726
Plaintiff:
Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company
Defendant:
AIFA Trucking, LLC, Silva Trucking, Inc., Luis Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sardina et al v. Charles et al
as 1:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marisol Sardina , Columba Rodriguez , Margarita Herrera and others
Defendant:
Long Peak Arches Inc, McDonalds Corporation, Lorena Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Ramirez et al v. RWI Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Stacee Ramirez , Rosemary Gonzales , Esmeralda Molina and others
Defendant:
RWI Construction, Inc., RWI Acquisition, LLC, Wade Dittrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marquez Avila v. Contreras Gallegos
as 1:2014cv00230
Petitioner:
Raquel Fabiola Marquez Avila
Respondent:
Rolando Contreras Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
