Cases 41 - 50 of 251
Hart et al v. City of La Junta et al
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Ivy Hart and Lucas Hart
Defendant:
City of La Junta, Arkansas Valley Regional Medical Center, Mitch Zgorzynski and others
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Jill Brady, Catherine Shea, Jenna Kruszka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Hoskins et al
as 4:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Defendant:
Chuck Hoskins, Jr, Bryan Warner, Sam Hider Health Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RX Medical LLC et al v. Melton et al
as 5:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
RX Medical LLC, ROK Sales LLC and ROK Medical Managment LLC
Defendant:
Rob Melton, Justin Poos, Brady Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frogge v. City of Bethany et al
as 5:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Michael C Frogge
Defendant:
City of Bethany, Bethany Police Department, Detective Angelo Orifice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brady v. USA
as 2:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
Cindy Brady
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Schmitendorf v. Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02293
Plaintiff:
BRADY SCHMITENDORF
Defendant:
JUICY'S VAPOR LOUNGE INC. and Juicy's Vapor Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Jill Brady, Jenna Kruszka, Phillip Wieser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
