Cases 41 - 50 of 333
Brooks v. Hanson et al
as 1:2018cv02666
Respondent:
Matthew Hanson and Cynthia Coffman
Petitioner:
Jason Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Larsen v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv02669
Petitioner:
Emmett Larsen
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coffman v. Bottling Group, LLC
as 1:2018cv02264
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Coffman
Defendant:
Bottling Group, LLC, PepsiCo, Inc. and Bottling Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wells v. Falk et al
as 1:2018cv02211
Respondent:
Cynthia H. Coffman and James Falk
Petitioner:
David Charles Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv02161
Petitioner:
Santos Joseph Torres
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch, Mike Romero and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baillie v. Werholtz et al
as 1:2018cv02126
Petitioner:
Robert W. Baillie
Respondent:
Cynthia Coffman and Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Masterpiece Cakeshop Incorporated et al v. Elenis et al
as 1:2018cv02074
Plaintiff:
Masterpiece Cakeshop Incorporated and Jack Phillips
Defendant:
Carol Fabrizio, Anthony Aragon, Miguel Rene Elias and others
Petitioner:
Coalition of Doctors Defending Reparative Therapy, National Alliance of Black Pastors, Center For Garden State Families and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia Amaro v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv01991
Defendant:
Cynthia Coffman, Mike Romero and Rick Raemisch
Plaintiff:
Christian Garcia Amaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Woodford et al
as 1:2018cv01947
Petitioner:
Mr. Derrick W Smith and Derrick W. Smith
Respondent:
Hon. Jean Woodford, Hon. Cynthia Coffman, Jeff Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv01912
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch and Cynthia H. Coffman
Petitioner:
Delano Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
