Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 84
In re: Frost
as 13-5077
Petitioner: In re: BRADLEY N. FROST
Frost v. USA
as 4:2013cv00358
Petitioner: Bradley N Frost
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Frost v. McKune, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3086
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH E. FROST
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility and STEVE SIX, Kansas Attorney General
Frost v. USA
as 1:2013cv00715
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Adam Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Landrith v. Schmidt, et al
as 12-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRET DAVID LANDRITH
Defendant - Appellee: DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his personal capacity, DON JORDAN, former Secretary of SRS, in his personal capacity, ROB SIEDLECKI, former Secretary SRS, in his personal capacity and others
Landrith v. Schmidt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRET DAVID LANDRITH
Defendant - Appellee: DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his personal capacity, DON JORDAN, former Secretary of SRS, in his personal capacity, ROB SIEDLECKI, former Secretary SRS, in his personal capacity and others
United States v. Frost
as 12-5162
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ALBERT WILHELM FROST
Evans v. American Fork City et al
as 2:2012cv00909
Plaintiff: Steve Ray Evans
Defendant: American Fork City, James H. Hadfield, Brad Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Frost
as 12-5065
Petitioner: In re: BRADLEY N. FROST
Landrith v. Kansas Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02161
Plaintiff: Bret D. Landrith
Defendant: Kansas Attorney General , Don Jordan, Rob Siedlecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?