Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Hammond v. Crum
as 1:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Defendant:
Peter Crum, Stob, Carol Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Stob et al
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Defendant:
Stob, Carol Rogers, Koonce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fischer et al v. Klescewski et al
as 1:2015cv01995
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fischer , Jessica Fischer , M. F. and others
Defendant:
Drew Klescewski , Nichole Backus, H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schreiner v. City of Louisville, Colorado, et al
as 1:2015cv00287
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Colorado , Louisville, CO Police Dept. , David Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Schreiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schreiner et al v. City of Louisville, CO et al
as 1:2014cv03383
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Schreiner and Robert V. Schreiner
Defendant:
City of Louisville, CO, Louisville, CO Police Dept., David Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Teller County, Colorado et al
as 1:2014cv03059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Graham
Defendant:
Teller County, Colorado, Mike (I) Ensminger , Mike Ensminger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stocks et al v. Gullicksrud et al
as 1:2013cv01141
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Daniel J. Oates, Bradley Gullicksrud and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Stocks and Thomas Stocks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greenway Nutrients, Inc. v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
Greenway Nutrients, Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Blackburn , Stacy Blackburn , David Selakovic and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.