Cases 41 - 50 of 85
James v. Davis
as 1:2013cv02616
Petitioner:
Marshall Dylan James
Defendant:
John L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis, et al v. Garcia, et al
as 13-4102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN L. DAVIS, SHARON D. DAVIS, KTD, a minor and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WENDY GARCIA, VERONICA KASPRZAK, AMY REED and others
Defendant:
DIANE WILKINS, Judge, ROBERT PARRISH, LAURA THOMPSON and others
Davis v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 6:2013cv01260
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Davis
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Griffin v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 13-1126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY LEE GRIFFIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado, TOM CLEMENTS, in his individual and offical capacities and JOHN L. DAVIS, in his individual and offical capacity
Davis v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 6:2013cv01027
Plaintiff:
Herschel L. Davis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv00455
Plaintiff:
Johnny L Davis
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Mr. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Clark, et al
as 12-3194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL W. CLARK, District Court Judge, JENNIFER L. JONES, Kansas Judicial Judge, RICHARD BALLINGER and others
Davis (ID 06598) v. McKune
as 5:2012cv03141
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Davis
Respondent:
David McKune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis (ID 06598) v. McKune
as 5:2012cv03142
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Davis
Respondent:
David McKune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis (ID 06598) v. McKune et al
as 5:2012cv03117
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Davis
Respondent:
David McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
