Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 189
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02783
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Recinos de Ramirez, et al v. Garland
as 23-9602
Petitioner: ABIGAIL NATHALY RECINOS DE RAMIREZ and GENESIS DIANA RAMIREZ-RECINOS
Respondent: MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Aposhian v. Garland, et al
as 23-4141
Plaintiff / Appellant: W. CLARK APOSHIAN
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States of America, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Hernandez-Gamon v. Garland
as 23-9599
Petitioner: JOSE HERNANDEZ-GAMON
Respondent: MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00946
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moraga, et al v. Garland
as 23-9597
Petitioner: ILEANA MORAGA, ILLIANA HERNANDEZ MORAGA, JOSE HERNANDEZ CASTELLON and others
Respondent: MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00948
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00738
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lawrence v. Garland
as 1:2023cv02199
Plaintiff: Michael Lawrence
Defendant: Merrick Garland, Steven Dettelbach and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Garland, et al
as 23-1293
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee: MERRICK GARLAND, Atty. Gen., MICHAEL HOROWITZ, O.I.G., DEPT. OF H.H.S. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?