Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Parrish v. Garrett, et al
as 10-3091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARQUIS GARRETT, Inmate, Larned Correctional Facility, SHELLEY LAURENT, Captain on Duty, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, WILLIAM H. BAIR, Captain, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and others
Scott v. Annual Credit Report Service
as 1:2010cv00614
Plaintiff:
Marquis Scott
Defendant:
Annual Credit Report Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Parrish v. Garrett et al
as 5:2010cv03051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Marquis Garrett, Shelley Laurent, William H. Bair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Major v. Addison
as 5:2010cv00073
Petitioner:
Marquis Dwon Major
Respondent:
Mike Addison and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Arrow Trucking Co.
as 4:2009cv00288
Plaintiff:
Marquis L Martin and Marquis L Martin
Defendant:
Arrow Trucking Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scott v. City Librarian Denver Public Library
as 1:2008cv01712
Plaintiff:
Marquis A. Scott
Defendant:
City Librarian Denver Public Library
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. Scott
as 1:2008cv01653
Plaintiff:
Marquis A. Scott
Defendant:
Mona Scott
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carroll et al v. HCA Health Services of Oklahoma Inc
as 5:2008cv00614
Plaintiff:
Frank Carroll, Peter Marquis, Mark Stotts and others
Defendant:
HCA Health Services of Oklahoma Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. Rosechild et al
as 1:2008cv00485
Plaintiff:
Marquis A. Scott
Defendant:
Rene Rosechild and Colorado Legal Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. Scott
as 1:2008cv00243
Plaintiff:
Marquis A. Scott
Defendant:
Mona Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
