Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Stuart C. Irby Company v. Dunamis Engineering LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00381
Plaintiff:
Stuart C. Irby Company
Defendant:
Dunamis Engineering LLC and Richard W Neph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guy v. Jorstad et al
as 1:2012cv01249
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Guy
Defendant:
Nathan Jorstad, Richard W. Myers, Steven W Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomlinson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv02128
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Tomlinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Lee et al
as 2:2011cv00454
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Jones
Defendant:
Samuel R. Lee , Utah Office of State Debt Collection and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoagland v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Hoagland
Defendant:
State of Utah and Salt Lake Legal Defender's Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Daniels et al
as 1:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Hutchings, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Lehman Brothers Bank, et al
as 11-4011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. HARRIS, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, ITS TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES and others
Ruston v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv03003
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Nalley, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Harris v. Lehman Brothers Bank et al
as 2:2010cv00690
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Harris
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Bank , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , ITS Title Insurance Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
