Cases 41 - 50 of 1,832
United States v. Rogers
as 23-7089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY DEWAYNE ROGERS
DeSousa (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv03284
Plaintiff:
Roger DeSousa
Defendant:
USA, Internal Revenue Service, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 23-8086
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity a/k/a Neicole Molden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rogers v. Jeff Foster Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
Nicole Rogers
Defendant:
Jeff Foster Trucking, Inc., Ron Allar Trucking, LLC d/b/a Jeff Foster Heavey Haul, Brimac, Inc. d/b/a Jeff Foster Trucking Brokerage Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden and David Rogers
Musonda v. Rogers
as 23-5128
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUBUTO MUSONDA
Respondent / Appellee:
MIKE ROGERS
United States v. Gurley
as 23-6193
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER TERRY GURLEY, JR., AKA Dark Side
Carter v. Genesis Alkali, et al
as 23-8079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUSTIN ROGER CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
GENESIS ALKALI LLC, GENESIS ENERGY LP, CODY J. PARKER and others
Three J. Hospitality LLC v. Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Three J. Hospitality LLC
Defendant:
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company and Omar Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
