Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Austin et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Arthur Austin , Charles Burkes , Ethel Caldwell and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline LLC , Aryan Kadivar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Fox
as 5:2013cv01280
Petitioner:
James Lee Williams, II
Respondent:
John B Fox, Charles E Samuels, Jr, J A Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teague et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 5:2013cv00833
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Teague , Susan Tagliaferro , Patricia Scales and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Cravatt v. Stacey et al
as 4:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Teddy Wayne Cravatt
Defendant:
Matt Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. $27,460 in United States Currency
as 4:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$27,460 in United States Currency and Stacy B Robinson
Claimant:
Beverly A Robinson , Lakisha Johnson , Sean L Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Rue v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Stacey Rue
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ward v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 4:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Stacey Leon Ward
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Witter et al
as 4:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stacey A Witter, Traci G Witter and Time Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rue v. BNSF Railway Company
as 5:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Stacey Rue
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
