Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hernandez v. City and County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2021cv01538
Defendant:
Ashley Botello, City and County of Denver, The, Jayme R. Larson and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Vance v. View Homes Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00881
Defendant:
Republic Land and Development Company, LP, Aspen View Homes, LLC, Armadillo Construction Company, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Vance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stallcup et al v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Chad Chappell, Casey Vance and Robert Stallcup
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Osterhout v. TCF Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00403
Defendant:
Barbara J. Mahone, Ronald A. Klein, David T. Provost and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Osterhout
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 10
Clark v. Murch et al
as 1:2021cv00390
Defendant:
Justin Moore, Cole Murch, Conner Lowande and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joe Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vance v. Kent et al
as 1:2020cv01229
Plaintiff:
Quinn Vance
Defendant:
Lucas Scott Kent and Ryder System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vance v. Kent et al
as 1:2020cv01230
Plaintiff:
Vance Quinn and Quinn Vance
Defendant:
Lucas Scott Kent and Ryder System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stewart, et al v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 20-6137
Defendant:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a municipal corporation, WILLIAM J. CITTY, in his individual capacity and VANCE ALLEN, in his individual capacity
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD MAHONEY, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LORIE STEWART and PATRICK STEWART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
