Cases 41 - 50 of 8,152
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
William Hart, Midge Barton and Adam Murdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
Brett A. Nelson
Defendant:
William Hart, Midge Barton, Adam Murdie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Johnson
as 4:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
William Oris Small, Jr
Defendant:
Allana Nicole Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Burleson et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burleson and Yvonne Burleson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Lyle William Wells, III and Trey Wells Insurance Agency, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Foote v. Hamilton
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Patrick Foote
Defendant:
William Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flemons (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Michael GA Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Chang v. Rout, et al
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
MENG UOY CHANG
Defendant:
DAVID ROUT, HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC., MURPHY CENTER LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
