Cases 51 - 60 of 1,341
Kemp v. Cox et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Nancy Elizabeth Kemp
Defendant:
Preston Cox, Tim Tipton and Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Dean, et al.
as 5:2024cv04008
Plaintiff:
Brittany Elizabeth Dean, Brittany Ecton and Brittany Sciara
Defendant:
Dana Dean, Dan Dean, Kansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Fuller et al v. Jefferson County, Colorado
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ANN PARADY, LAURA M. HODGSON, ROCHELLE M. HOFFMAN and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 47101 - Airport & Airway Improvement Act
Sandy v. The State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1019
Plaintiff:
BAYARDO RENO SANDY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF COLORADO, PHIL WEISER, Colorado Attorney General, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Czajkowski v. Edwards, et al
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
CONRAD J. CZAJKOWSKI
Defendant:
AMANDA S. EDWARDS, ELIZABETH A. CHRISTIAENS and HALEY SHUVEILLER
Wright-Smith v. FAA
as 23-9608
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH WRIGHT-SMITH
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Roybal v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Greg Roybal
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Aiste Chamblin, Chirag Acharya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Terracon Consultants, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ross
Defendant:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Kuczmanski v. Obray et al
as 2:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Jeana Kuczmanski
Defendant:
Diana Obray, Deborah Wood, Patricia Hartzell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
