Cases 51 - 60 of 79
United States Department of Labor, Secretary of v. Luc et al
as 6:2012cv01005
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor, Secretary of
Defendant:
Hank Luc and Xin G. Chen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crittenden v. McNeelan
as 1:2011cv00580
Plaintiff:
William C Crittenden
Defendant:
FNU McNeelan, FNU Bishops, Patti Rentfro and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Williams v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 11-8041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, TETON COUNTY, HANK PHIBBS and others
Lensky et al v. County of Huerfano, Colorado et al
as 1:2010cv02815
Plaintiff:
Gary Lensky, Rafi Caneti and Zachary Pedigo
Defendant:
County of Huerfano, Colorado, Bruce (I) Newman, Bruce Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bame et al v. Iron County et al
as 2:2010cv00890
Plaintiff:
Mildred Bame , Desma R. Auclair , Ronda L. McKinnis and others
Defendant:
Iron County, Iron County Sheriff's Office, Mark O. Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay et al v. Pelle et al
as 1:2010cv01840
Plaintiff:
David Clay , Matthew Deherrera , Lamont Morgan and others
Defendant:
Joe Pelle and Larry R. Hank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Teton County, Hank Phibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Galetka
as 2:1995cv00846
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Gardner
Defendant:
Hank Galetka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
