Cases 51 - 60 of 108
Muathe et al v. Fleming et al
as 2:2016cv02108
Plaintiff:
Eric M. Muathe , Julie Stover , Kasey King and others
Defendant:
Lori B. Fleming , Kurtis Loy , My Town Media, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2015cv01293
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. King
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson (ID 77685) v. King et al
as 5:2015cv03183
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Jackson
Defendant:
Amanda King, Kevin Edwards and James Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2015cv04900
Plaintiff:
John C Richardson
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Barack Obama, Treasury, Department of the United States, Secretary of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bartley v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2015cv03153
Plaintiff:
Patrick Leon Bartley
Defendant:
Tyler Pruitt, Joe Rucker, Shawn King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheatham v. Leavenworth County of et al
as 5:2015cv03123
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cheatham
Defendant:
Leavenworth County of, (fnu) King and (fnu) Pray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02908
Plaintiff:
Deborah King
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and General Motors Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
King et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02112
Plaintiff:
Larry King and King Farms
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Airosol Company, Inc. v. Rural King Holding Co.
as 6:2015cv01006
Plaintiff:
Airosol Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Rural King Holding Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyles v. Shawnee County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv03157
Plaintiff:
Dominique Lee Boyles
Defendant:
Shawnee County Jail, Brian Cole, Shawn King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
