Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 389
Snedeker v. State of Colorado et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff: Bradford Wayne Snedeker, Sr.
Defendant: State of Colorado, Anjali Nandi, Denise Mertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Hess
as 23-1008
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MEGAN HESS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04068
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. UT-TEX et al
as 2:2022cv00739
Plaintiff: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance
Defendant: UT-TEX a Utah corporation doing business as Vista Sage doing business as Vista Magna, Mika Mercey, Britta Niederer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Kyte v. Mayes, et al
as 22-1397
Plaintiff / Appellant: MEGAN KYTE
Defendant / Appellee: STEVE MAYES and THE OREGONIAN
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff: Deanna Lopez
Defendant: Megan Day Hill, Lawrence Hill and Persons Unknown
Not Classified By Court: Patricia Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stephens et al v. Sparkman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff: Linh Stephens and Jane Doe
Defendant: Rodney Sparkman, April Seibert, James Hubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mather v. Cody Regional Health Center Inc Physician et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff: Natalie A Mather
Defendant: MD Stephanie Knodel, RN Gena, RN Megan Maus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Kyte v. King
as 22-1317
Plaintiff / Appellant: MEGAN KYTE
Defendant / Appellee: JOEY KING
Kyte v. I.R.S.
as 22-1318
Plaintiff / Appellant: MEGAN KYTE
Defendant / Appellee: I.R.S.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?