Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Williams (ID 62520) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2012cv03201
Plaintiff:
Otis Leavell Williams
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and El Dorado Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halstied v. Crothall Healthcare Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Jamie Halstied
Defendant:
Crothall Healthcare Inc and Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Macquarie Mortgages USA v. Premier Title Insurance Agency et al
as 2:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Macquarie Mortgages USA
Defendant:
Premier Title Insurance Agency, Shane Norris, Dustin Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auten v. Koch et al
as 4:2011cv00786
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Lee Auten, Jr
Defendant:
Ty Koch and Otis Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chatkehoodle v. Porter et al
as 4:2010cv00615
Plaintiff:
Tara Chatkehoodle
Defendant:
Victor Porter , Otis Gaddis , Sam Troglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peralta v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.(WSI) et al
as 1:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Martin Peralta and Martin Peralta
Defendant:
Wackenhut Services, Inc.(WSI), Otis E. Cooksey and Steve Weldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Valley View Angus Ranch, et al v. Duke Energy Field Services
as 09-6185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VALLEY VIEW ANGUS RANCH, INC., an Oklahoma corporation and OTIS CULPEPPER, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES, INC., a Colorado limited partnership
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lacy v. Parker
as 09-6095
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS H. LACY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
