Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 125
Pittman v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2020cv00760
Defendant: No Named Defendants
Plaintiff: Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Interested Party: Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Pittman et al
as 1:2019cv03344
Defendant: John C. Conrad, Robert L. Cowan, Joseph W. Glauber and others
Plaintiff: Anna Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03259
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chesley v. Bonnie Plants Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00943
Plaintiff: Sheridan Chesley
Defendant: Bonnie Plants Inc and Jeremy Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pittman v. Holcomb et al
as 1:2019cv02641
Defendant: Vansickle and T. Holcomb
Plaintiff: Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. $3,581.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2019cv02630
Defendant: $53,240.00 in United States Currency and $3,581.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: USA
Claimant: Maria Pittman and Carlos Valdez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Pittman v. Matevousian We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02221
Petitioner: Darnell Love Pittman, Sr.
Respondent: Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Pittman v. City of Aurora et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02209
Defendant: Delbert L. Tisdale, Jr., Anthony Spano, James McElroy and others
Plaintiff: Teddy Tanoris Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Palacio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01947
Defendant: Kevin Palacio, City of Aurora, Darian Dasko and others
Plaintiff: Teddy Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ables v. Blansett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02250
Plaintiff: Rodney Ables
Defendant: Wilcox Truck Line, Inc., Craig Pittman and Keith Blansett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?