Cases 51 - 60 of 378
Rogers v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:10-cr-10186-JWB-1.)
as 6:2019cv01321
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond L. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company v. Weis et al
as 5:2019cv04108
Defendant:
Brenda Allensworth, Estate of Tristen Kuritz, Frank Workman and others
Plaintiff:
Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company, An Ohio Insurance Company and Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2019cv03218
Defendant:
(fnu) Echols, (fnu) Galloway, (fnu) Byers and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Olsen et al
as 2:2019cv02575
Defendant:
Roger J. Olsen and Glenda L. Repp
Plaintiff:
James Roberts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212
Roberts v. Peck et al
as 5:2019cv03161
Defendant:
Roger Soldan, Angela Finch, Stan Fruits and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr.
Interested Party:
Saline County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown (ID 95054) v. Lundry et al
as 5:2019cv03152
Defendant:
Debra Lundry, Jennifer Clements, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith (ID 50867) v. Aramark et al
as 5:2019cv03146
Defendant:
Aramark, (fnu) Garcia, Air-Mark and others
Plaintiff:
Roger O. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers (ID 115224) v. Cline et al
as 5:2019cv03145
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Rogers
Defendant:
Richard English, Sam Cline and (fnu) Sissell
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. Soldan
as 5:2019cv03135
Respondent:
Roger Soldan
Petitioner:
Clay Robert Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Snyder v. Soldan
as 5:2019cv03134
Respondent:
Roger Soldan
Petitioner:
Clay Robert Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
