Cases 61 - 70 of 669
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gonzalez Burciaga v. Garland
as 23-9538
Petitioner:
ADRIAN GONZALEZ BURCIAGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Sell v. Gonzalez
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jacob Tomas Sell
Defendant:
J Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez et al v. Pro-Health, LLC
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Atilano Rodriguez, Onofre Valencia Gonzalez and Azucena Martinez Pahua
Defendant:
Pro-Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 - Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
Gonzalez v. Stancil
as 1:2023cv00893
Petitioner:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Moses A. Stancil
Defendant:
Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 23-4042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOY ARLAN BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, PETE AGUILAR, COLIN Z. ALLRED and others
Gonzalez v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Tamara Gonzalez
Defendant:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gonzalez Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Miguel Octavio Gonzalez Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
