Cases 61 - 70 of 173
Chon v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Tae H. Chon
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, George W. Bush, John D. Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Punchard v. Deming City Municipal Court, et al
as 15-2202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUBLIC MINISTER WILLIAM LORD PUNCHARD
Defendant - Appellee:
DEMING CITY MUNICIPAL COURT, DEMING CITY MUNICIPAL JUDGE FRANK M. VAN GUNDY, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Ross v. Addison, et al
as 15-6159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMOND DAVIS ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MIKE ADDISON, SGT. BUSH, DENNIS ROSE and others
Valdez et al v. National Security Agency et al
as 2:2015cv00584
Plaintiff:
Mary Josephine Valdez, Howard Stephenson, Deeda Seed and others
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Smith v. Bush
as 1:2015cv01735
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ray Smith
Defendant:
George Walker Bush and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 1317
Bush v. Drisco, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv00221
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bush
Defendant:
Drisco, LLC and William Franklin Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward Family LLC et al v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ward Family LLC and Dallas Cody Barnett, Jr.
Defendant:
Derek Jones, Jones Family LLC, BlueRidge Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Law v. Bush et al
as 1:2015cv00898
Plaintiff:
David Law
Defendant:
David Bush and David B Bush LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. McCool et al
as 5:2015cv04011
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dana Arthur McCool, Calvin Wayne Bush, Christy Colleen Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
