Cases 61 - 70 of 921
Arnett v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joshua C Arnett
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, David W Prater, Cameron M Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strange v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Robert Joe Strange
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Oklahoma State Department of Human Services, et al
as 23-5015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, NACISKA GILMORE, LATRESSA AVERY and others
Marsee et al v. Serpik
as 5:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Angela C Marsee, Oklahoma State of, Colby Vaughan and others
Defendant:
Roman V Serpik
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
David v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Jerome Adrian David
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Martinez v. Farris
as 23-6001
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICA ALEXANDER MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
