Cases 71 - 80 of 827
McMillan v. Alexander, et al
as 23-3059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETTIX MCMILLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BYRON ALEXANDER, KIM TILSON, JUSTIN KENNETT and others
Velasquez v. Lucero et al
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Alexander Velasquez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya Lucero and Andrea Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mostaert v. Converse County District Court et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Jesse Alexander Mostaert
Respondent:
Converse County District Court and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Alexander Harrison West
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Baldwin v. Egelhoff et al
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Gary Baldwin
Defendant:
Martin Egelhoff, Beth McCann, Stephen Pedregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Alexander Anthony Velasquez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Fox Run Apartments, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fox Run Apartments, LLC, Peterson Properties, Inc., Marilyn Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United States v. Sutton
as 23-2022
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER SUTTON
Alexander v. Lumio Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Cathy Alexander
Defendant:
Lumio Inc, Lumio HX, Lumio Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Miller v. Mile Hi Foods Co., et al
as 23-1051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAHMAL MILLER
Defendant / Appellant:
MILE HI FOODS, CO. and CHRISTOPHER C. WATSON
Defendant:
ALEXANDER H. TRUDDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
