Cases 71 - 80 of 364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00755
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Verdream v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Verdream
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, FNU Duff, FNU Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael Navarro
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Carson, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longoria v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Longoria
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Lucero , Lucero (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Pryor et al
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. McKenzie
Defendant:
Joe Pryor, Corrections Corporation of America, Donna Mellendeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Sutmiller et al
as 5:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bradley Price Barber
Defendant:
Don Sutmiller, Genese McCoy, Chad Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 15-7001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINN AARON KLEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, MARTY GARRISON, TIM WILKERSON and others
Brown v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2014cv01426
Petitioner:
Kevin Maurice Brown
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson, Laimmer Ray, Tanner Traci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Rankins, et al
as 14-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
W. RANKINS and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Marshall v. Rankins, et al
as 14-7097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
W. RANKINS and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
