Cases 71 - 80 of 132
Brown et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Gordon Beh , Huber Indus Aun , Robert Oslar and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gill et al v. Remar Investments
as 2:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
Roger Michael Gill , Douglas Brandon Horrocks and Jeremy Gilbert Wootten
Defendant:
Remar Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marner v. State of Colorado
as 1:2015cv00991
Plaintiff:
Zachary Marner, Mackenzie Marner and Nevaeh Marner
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Daniel J. Oates, Steven T. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Gillings v. Banvelos et al
as 1:2015cv00172
Plaintiff:
Nigel Gillings
Defendant:
Banvelos, Yagar, H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv - Fed. Question - Bivens-Prisoner
Norton v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00874
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
State of Utah, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Mark S. Kouris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunnell v. Gill et al
as 5:2014cv03206
Plaintiff:
Kelly S. Tunnell
Defendant:
Jason B. Gill, Jon Gill, Robert L. Hephner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00782
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
State of Utah, Mark S. Kouris, Sim Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00743
Plaintiff:
Felicita Torres , Joann Stevens-Tronson , Sue Stevenson and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Bayard v. Swallow et al
as 2:2014cv00551
Plaintiff:
Antwon Maurice Bayard
Defendant:
John Swallow, Mark Shurtleff, Troy Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
