Cases 81 - 90 of 418
Chavez v. Polis, et al
as 21-1221
Defendant / Appellee:
LIMON MEDICAL NURSE AND PROVIDER JOHN DOE OR JANE DOE, RANDOLPH MAUL, MD - Doctor of Medicine, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN CHAVEZ
David v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv00534
Defendant:
Paul Haines, T Lauer, FNU Glover and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackes et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv01100
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Adrian Chavez, Brian Christopher Mackes and National Federation of the Blind of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. The Geo Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Joedell Robert Perkins and Miguel Adrian Adams
Defendant:
Lawton Correctional Facility, Mr Bowden and The Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David v. LNU
as 5:2021cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Rendon et al
as 4:2021cv00128
Defendant:
Bukanas Night Club, LLC d/b/a Bukanas Night Club - Bukanas Night Club, Adrian Rendon individually and d/b/a Bukanas Night Club - Bukanas Night Club, Adrian Rendon individually doing business as Bukanas Night Club and others
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lacey v. Colt et al
as 1:2021cv00853
Defendant:
Kristen L. Hoffacker, Jason Berns and Edward Colt
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. Nohava
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Defendant:
Nathaniel Nohava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Lacey v. Santini
as 1:2021cv00851
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Defendant:
Santini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. Winn
as 1:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Defendant:
Jeremy Winn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
