Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 87 of 87
Timmerman et al v. Taga Air Charter Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00007
Plaintiff: Patrick James Timmerman, Joshua Patrick Agcaoili Timmerman and Purley Agcaoili Timmerman
Defendant: Taga Air Charter Services, Inc., Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd., Tinian Dynasty Hotel, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Video Professor, Inc. v. John Does 1-100 Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01726
Plaintiff: Video Professor, Inc.
Defendant: John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kouris v. Gurley, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1293
Plaintiff - Appellant: VINCENT GEORGE KOURIS
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD THOMAS JUDGE RICHARD THOMAS GURLEY, 21st Judicial District, Mesa County, AMANDA JUDGE AMANDA BAILEY, 21st Judicial District, Mesa County, PETE DA PETE HATZINGER, District Attorney's Office, 21st Judicial District and others
Told v. Interwest Const. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-4156
Plaintiff - Appellant: MORRIS INDIVIDUALLY
Defendant - Appellee: INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a Utah Corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive
Watson v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv04033
Plaintiff: James T Watson and James T Watson
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Johnson, et al v. Pomeroy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-8016
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD A. JOHNSON, IDA JOHNSON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-100
Defendant - Appellee: CYNTHIA A. POMEROY, in her official capacity as Director, Wyoming Department of Employment, GARY W. CHILD, in his official capacity as Administrator, Workers' Safety and Compensation Division, PEGGY ELGIN, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator, Wyoming Workers' Saftey and Compensation Division and others
Coyle v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02088
Plaintiff: Peter Coyle and Peter Coyle
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?