Cases 81 - 90 of 129
Marshall v. WY Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-8033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT OWEN MARSHALL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC./CORIZON HEALTH, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, individually and inis official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Helms et al
as 1:2013mc00207
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A. Helms, Janniece S. Kaelin, Deven Sellers and others
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Hickerson et al
as 6:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sherman Hickerson, William Vestal, Steven Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xanthos v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01327
Plaintiff:
Antonios Xanthos
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Troy Haley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Haley et al
as 5:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mary Ann Haley, Southwest Oklahoma Community Action Group Inc, Oklahoma Health Care Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Haley, Sr., et al v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 12-5168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY WAYNE HALEY, SR., an individual
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HALEY, an individual, ASHLEY HALEY, an individual, S.H., an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA
Defendant:
TULSA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Haley
as 12-5094
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BOBBY WAYNE HALEY, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
