Cases 81 - 90 of 8,471
Pappas v. Moham, et al
as 24-1283
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENT SHANNON MOHAM, ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER D. HUME and ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER EMELY CARRENO
Plaintiff:
WESLEY WAYNE PAPPAS
Lawton (PS) v. Wolford et al
as 1:2024cv01854
Defendant:
Linda Stanley, Billy Salazar, M. D. Wolford and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Reed Lawton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkinson v. Rotskoff et al
as 4:2024cv00314
Defendant:
Jose Lopez Lopez, Jr, Andrew Gleeson, Rachel Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Nighthawk Investigation (PS) et al v. Highline Post Acute et al
as 1:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Louis D. Hatchett, James D. Smith and Nighthawk Investigation
Defendant:
Cosmo, Highline Post Acute and Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frye v. Lowes Home Centers LLC
as 5:2024cv00657
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers LLC
Plaintiff:
Kelvin D Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Victorino v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1272
Petitioner:
ANGEL D. VICTORINO
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, L.C.F. Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Cosby v. Cillio, et al
as 24-1271
Respondent:
BOP, (NCRO), A. CILLIO, Warden, AW (PROGRAMS) COMPLEX and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Miller, et al v. Bullseye Energy, et al
as 24-603
Petitioner:
JAMES H. MILLER, SHARON RIGSBY MILLER, CAROLYN R. ENLOE and others
Respondent:
BULLSEYE ENERGY, LLC, CEP MIDCONTINENT, LLC, KRS&K and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
