Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bolling v. Engelbert, et al
as 23-1068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAPATRICK BOLLING
Defendant / Appellee:
ZACHARY J. ENGELBERT, M.D., COLORADO STATE HOSPITAL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Howard v. Baca et al
as 5:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Candice Howard
Defendant:
Jason Baca, Bobby Elmore, City of Purcell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolling v. Correctional Health Partners et al
as 1:2020cv01004
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Siobhan Burtlow, J. Brinkerhoff and others
Plaintiff:
Kapatrick Bolling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mountain Pursuit v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2019cv00199
Defendant:
Bridger Teton National Forest Supervisor, Caribou Targhee National Forest Supervisor, United States Forest Service and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Pursuit
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Mason v. Foothills Farm, RLLLP et al
as 1:2019cv02653
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mason and Kimberly Bolles
Defendant:
Albertson's, LLC d/b/a Safeway, Foothills Farm, RLLLP, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv01754
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, Boll, Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Bolles et al
as 1:2018cv02061
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, John E. Westcut, Denise Ashaur and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Bolls
as 1:2018cv00692
Plaintiff:
James Edward Thomas
Defendant:
G. Bolls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolles v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv01214
Plaintiff:
Gene E. Bolles
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harvey v. Rohling et al
as 5:2011cv03137
Plaintiff:
Levi Lloyd Harvey
Defendant:
Karen Rohling, Ray Reno, Paht Willesdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
