Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Valley Property, LLC v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Valley Property, LLC
Defendant:
Tuan Q. Nguyen and Tai Tan Ngyuen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Poppell v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nicole Poppell and Nicole (I) Poppell
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Board of County Commissioners for El Paso County, Colorado, The, Joseph Roybal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tay v. City of Tulsa et al
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Tay
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, George Theron Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Liu et al v. Skaggs et al
as 1:2022cv02468
Plaintiff:
Meei Liu and Tai Liu
Defendant:
Corey Lee Skaggs and VSS Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jong Tai USA v. Burd and Fletcher
as 2:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jong Tai USA
Defendant:
Burd and Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tay v. Pazzo
as 5:2022cv00484
Petitioner:
Paul Tay
Respondent:
Stephen R Pazzo
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Godwin et al v. NA Transport, Inc et al
as 6:2021cv00315
Plaintiff:
Randy Godwin and Reba Godwin
Defendant:
NA Transport, Inc, US Xpress, Inc, US Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
