Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00245
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez Jr. v. The City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Benito Victor Martinez Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Albuquerque, Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners, Bernalillo County Metropolian Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas (ID 96000) v. Williams
as 5:2022cv03194
Petitioner:
Benito Cardenas, Jr.
Respondent:
Ness, City of, Kansas and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peck et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv00321
Defendant:
California, State of, Fiona Ma, Lou Correa and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck and Jay Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVaughn v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 5:2020cv04003
Defendant:
DEA and Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff:
Benito DeVaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ildefonso v. Miedich
as 1:2019cv03134
Plaintiff:
Benito Ildefonso
Defendant:
Carl M. Miedich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Judd et al
as 1:2019cv00681
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and Betty Judd
Petitioner:
Benito David Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lara v. Arizona Maricopa County
as 1:2018cv02589
Respondent:
No Named Defendants, No Named Respondents and Arizona Maricopa County
Petitioner:
Esteban Benito Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
