Cases 1 - 10 of 39
State of Kansas, et al v. Garland, et al
as 24-3101
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity, as the United States Attorney General, STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, in his official capacity, as the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Boyer v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv02298
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Robert Boyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Virginia, State of, South Carolina, State of, Idaho, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Petitioner:
Ohio, State of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DeWilde v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives Director, Merrick Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Jake Stanley DeWilde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lawrence v. Garland, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Aposhian v. Garland, et al
as 23-4141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
W. CLARK APOSHIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States of America, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Rywelski v. Biden, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-5099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH MARION RYWELSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., President, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND and others
DeWilde v. United States Attorney General, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 23-8054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE STANLEY DEWILDE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv02318
Petitioner:
Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. doing business as Bullet Hole Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, The
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Brown v. Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation et al
as 5:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
David Erle Brown
Defendant:
Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.