Cases 1 - 10 of 5,927
Owen v. Powell
as 24-4065
Petitioner:
SEAN C. OWEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF UTAH and ROBERT POWELL, Warden
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jamie C. v. Health Care Services Corporation
as 2:2024cv02229
Plaintiff:
Jamie C.
Defendant:
Health Care Services Corporation doing business as BlueCross BlueShield of Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
K. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Roman K. and C. K.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Behavioral Health, Delta Airlines Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
R. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Justin R. and C. R.
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company and United Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, D. C. Cole, Christine Topping and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strader (ID 66677) v. Snider et al
as 5:2024cv03080
Petitioner:
James C. Strader
Respondent:
Libby Snider, Natasha Carter, Chadayne C. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
