Cases 1 - 10 of 6,123
Brown v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2025cv00296
Plaintiff:
Edward R Brown, Sr
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Fred C Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2025cv00297
Plaintiff:
Edward R Brown, Sr
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Fred C Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roche et al v. Robbins
as 5:2025cv00291
Plaintiff:
Randall C Roche and Kent and Julie Taylor
Defendant:
Scott Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
C & B Pharmacy Inc et al v. Change Healthcare Inc et al
as 5:2025cv00293
Plaintiff:
C & B Pharmacy Inc Individually doing business as Hospital Discount Pharmacy and C & B Pharmacy Inc on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Hospital Discount Pharmacy
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc, Optum Inc and UnitedHealth Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crump (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2025cv00719
Plaintiff:
Norvell Crump
Defendant:
USA, A. Ciolli, Coastal Raze Regional Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serpik Family v. Webb, et al
as 25-6026
Plaintiff:
ROMAN VLADIMIROVICH SERPIK
Defendant:
GINA WEBB, ANGELA C. MARSEE, COLBY VAUGHAN and others
Liu v. Carter
as 5:2025cv03036
Petitioner:
Wing Nuen Liu
Respondent:
C. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Golden, et al
as 25-5024
Plaintiff:
STACY-LYNN JONES and J. R. D., a minor
Defendant:
DOUGLAS W. GOLDEN, PAMELA B. HAMMERS and JASON C. SERNER
Grelle v. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 2:2025cv00189
Plaintiff:
Peter C Grelle
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management and Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jimmerson v. Horne et al
as 5:2025cv00238
Plaintiff:
Steven M Jimmerson
Defendant:
C Horne, FNU Perez, FNU White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
