Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Moody et al v. Diamond Care Santa Fe, LLC, d/b/a Santa Fe Care Center
as 1:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Michael Moody, Michael Moody, as Personal Representative and The Estate of Pauline Cardenas
Defendant:
Diamond Care Santa Fe, LLC, d/b/a Santa Fe Care Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Cardenas v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 1:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Mary Cardenas
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Cardenas v. Hernandez et al
as 6:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Cardenas
Defendant:
Jose Hernandez, The City of Garden City, Kansas and Garden City, Kansas, The City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pittman (PS) v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Cardenas, Bryant and Roland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2023cv02195
Plaintiff:
Demetrio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mario Cardenas and MC Welding Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Lewis (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01917
Plaintiff:
Jacob L. Lewis
Defendant:
Moses Stancil, Damon Hiningen, Louis Cabling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Cardenas, et al
as 23-1232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CARDENAS, BRYANT and ROLAND JACKSON
Cardenas v. Dish Network L.L.C.
as 1:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardenas
Defendant:
Dish Network L.L.C.
Petitioner:
Ritha Fullmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
Cardenas et al v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cardenas and Patricia Michel
Defendant:
Carl Moody and J.B.C. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
