Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dangim v. APD et al
as 1:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Dangim
Defendant:
APD, DA, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dangim v. APD et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Dangim
Defendant:
APD, Isleta Casino and CDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Smith
as 21-5057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT SMITH
Dangim v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2021cv00358
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Department of Corrections, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Dangim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rohan (ID 122011) v. Saline County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv03068
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Rohan
Defendant:
Jamie (lnu), Saline County Jail, Lou Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarnecki v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00118
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Sarnecki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burton v. Oklahoma Forensic Center
as 4:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Burton
Defendant:
Oklahoma Forensic Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dangim v. LNU et al
as 1:2016cv00812
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Dangim
Defendant:
FNU LNU and FNU Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clevenger et al. v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02471
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Clevenger and Scott Clevenger Farms
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JGE et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv00710
Plaintiff:
JGE , Gabriela Gallegos , Jolene Estrada and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Christopher Scott Godier, Patricia G. Whelan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
