Cases 1 - 10 of 401
T. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Christie T.
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and Choice POS II HDHP Active Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Boswell v. CSAA General Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Christi Boswell
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Varela v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Christy Varela
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Stephens County, et al
as 24-6016
Plaintiff:
J.T. RICH
Defendant:
STEPHENS COUNTY, DEXTER LAWLEY, individual capacity as captain and internal affairs officer, CHEYENNE UNDERWOOD, individual capacity as Public Defender for Stephens County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
