Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hunter v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Walter D Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Walter D. Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denver Homeless Out Loud et al v. Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv02985
Defendant:
Kristin (I) Bronson, Cleveland, Jared (I) S. Polis and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Warner, Charles Davis, Michael Lamb and others
Amicus Curiae:
ACLU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Hunter
as 1:2018cv00508
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
William D Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Manzanares et al v. Office of the Attorney General of the State of Utah et al
as 2:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Benito Manzanares , Christopher David Thomas Carlton , Jake M. Strickland and others
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Utah , Mark L. Shurtleff and John E. Swallow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United Transportation Union, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 10-2234
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BEN D. ABEYTA, RICHARD T. ADAMS, JOHNNY AGUILAR and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, LAWRENCE RAEL, Chief Administrative Officer and MARTIN CHAVEZ, Mayor
Intervenor - Appellant:
JENNIFER BEAN and BEAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
United Transportation Union Lo, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 08-2103
Plaintiff:
UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION LOCAL 1745, ROBERT C. GUTIERREZ, Chairman, JOHN D. HUNTER, President and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, MARTIN CHAVEZ, Mayor and LAWRENCE RAEL, Chief Administrative Officer
Attorney - Appellant:
PAUL STEVEN LIVINGSTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
