Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00318
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Stevens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Ezell, et al
as 14-7085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT EZELL, Warden, MARTIN, Assistant Warden, SGT. ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
CHIEF COTTON, Chief of Security, SGT. W. BERNECK, SGT. HOSUM and others
Stevens v. John Doe United States Attorney et al
as 5:2014cv03131
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 14-6061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY D. STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION and OPM OKLAHOMA PERSONNEL
Stevens v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D Stevens
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma Tax Commission and OPM Oklahoma Personnel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ezell, et al
as 13-7025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT EZELL, Warden, MARTIN, Assistant Warden, CHIEF COTTON, Chief of Security and others
Williams v. Ezell et al
as 6:2011cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mario Williams
Defendant:
Robert Ezell, Martin, Chief Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Stevens et al
as 2:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Robert J. Stevens, Debbie D. Stevens and Robert J. and Debbie D. Stevens Family LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.