Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis (ID 06598) v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv03270
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Derek Schmidt, Laura Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03247
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Reno, County of, Derek Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2021cv03205
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Daniel L. Schnurr, Debra K. Lundry, Jennifer J. Davisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanPorfliet et al v. Carpet Direct Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00616
Plaintiff:
Paul VanPorfliet , Carpet Direct Trust , VP Property & Development, LLC and others
Defendant:
Carpet Direct Corporation , Gayle Crouch , Greg Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
United States of America v. Davisson, et al
as 5:2011cv04128
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tammy J. Davisson and Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Reedy, et al v. Werholtz
as 11-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. REEDY, TODD DEAL, GRANT NIXON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections
Reedy et al v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2010cv03155
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Reedy , Todd Deal , Grant Nixon and others
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alderton, et al v. Crown Cork Seal Co, et al
as 1:1994cv01034
Plaintiff:
John R. Alderton , Jacquelin F. Alderton , Richard W. Armistaed and others
Defendant:
Crown Cork and Seal Company , Asbestos Claims Management Corporation and Lloyd L. Crocker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
