Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis et al v. Gresham et al
as 5:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Davis
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Susan Manchester
Defendant:
Daniel Robert Gresham and Standard Fire Insurance Company The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Standard Fire Insurance Company The v. Gresham et al
as 5:2021cv00828
Plaintiff:
Standard Fire Insurance Company The
Defendant:
Daniel Robert Gresham and Christopher John Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Strong v. Scout Security, Inc. et al.
as 1:2021cv00418
Defendant:
Scout Security Limited, Daniel Roberts, Scout Security, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeLuna v. Levy et al
as 1:2020cv01012
Defendant:
Allison P Pieroni, Melton Montoya, Eva Montoya and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert DeLuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. Scout Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00771
Plaintiff:
John Strong
Defendant:
Daniel Roberts, Scout Security, Inc., Sol Majteles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiamichi River Legacy Alliance, Inc., The et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 6:2019cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Redman, Justin Jackson, Kenneth Roberts and others
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, Julie Cunningham, Gary Batton and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Schaller v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv01911
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert Schaller
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Akre v. Lightle et al
as 5:2016cv00665
Petitioner:
Daniel Robert Akre
Respondent:
Arthur Lightle and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Akre v. Lightle et al
as 6:2016cv00255
Petitioner:
Daniel Robert Akre
Respondent:
Arthur Lightle and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
